I agree that the use of "photoshop" was misleading and distracting. I went into the article expecting to learn about the industry standard software application

I agree that the use of "photoshop" was misleading and distracting. I went into the article expecting to learn about the industry standard software application for modifying sound recordings. It wasn't until a few paragraphs in that I realized he meant "photoshop" as a verb. Even then it doesn't really work, since Photoshop operates on a single static file, while the sound system described operates on a dynamic stream of live sound. The analogy is hurting the article more than helping it.