The article proves my point. What if anything are you trying to get at? Apparently, you've never heard of the Pure Food and Drug Act either, or why it was crea

The article proves my point. What if anything are you trying to get at? Apparently, you've never heard of the Pure Food and Drug Act either, or why it was created, given the presence of adulterants common in goods at the time. People like you don't want to understand--rather, you'd like to adhere to your flawed worldview. There's no sense in arguing with people like you. I hate to say this, but it needs to be said: you're an idiot.