3 ms·
All your arguments would carry more weight if Apple had released more failures and its competitors more successes in the recent past. Which seems (at least to m
by doe88 12y ago
All your arguments would carry more weight if Apple had released more failures and its competitors more successes in the recent past. Which seems (at least to me) not the case.
- mike_hearn 12y agoApple has released a tiny number of products that sell extremely well and are very profitable, in Japan and English-speaking markets (USA, UK, Australia, etc). Their competitors have released more products that cater to a wider range of people, and dominate the market elsewhere. In most European markets for example iPhone sits at around 10% market share. It spikes when they release a new version of the iPhone once a year then quickly settles back down again. So it depends how you define success. Apple could be successful for a long time in the same way Microsoft were successful for the last 15 years - by being highly profitable and cranking out new versions of their flagship products, whilst releasing very few new notable hits.