4 ms·
What is your objection to that? Isn't that a pretty good description of Tor? If you're trying to say that tor doesn't replace the IP in TCP/IP, well that's tru
by eterm 12y ago
What is your objection to that? Isn't that a pretty good description of Tor?
If you're trying to say that tor doesn't replace the IP in TCP/IP, well that's true, but I think the author used internet protocol in the wider sense of the meaning.
- Zigurd 12y agoThere are at least two large errors: First, Tor isn't a browser. The Tor project provides Tor packaged with a browser, but the Tor project is more than that, while the Tor onion router is something completely different from a browser. Second, "non-standard" is a terribly misleading way to describe Tor. That's in the "not even wrong" category of being off the mark. Anyone not familiar with Tor reading that will be worse off than uninformed.