4 ms·
None of that screed explains why you felt compelled to threadshit with "not worth 10¢ to me". You are able to "structurally read" to see what's going on without
by bonaldi 12y ago
None of that screed explains why you felt compelled to threadshit with "not worth 10¢ to me". You are able to "structurally read" to see what's going on without such comments, surely.
- jacquesm 12y agoBecause the GGGP asked 'who wouldn't pay $3 for this'.
- bonaldi 12y agoI think it's implicit in the premise that only people who are interested in the topic would be prepared to pay anything to read something on it. The charitable interpretation of his question would be "who, of the people who find this topic interesting, would not be willing to pay $3 for it?". The question you are presumably structurally answering is "why wouldn't absolutely everybody in the whole world pay $3 for this?". In answering that, you were either being insulting to GGGP, or looking for a pretext to wedge in an "I don't care about this" comment. I suspect the latter.
- burnstek 12y agoApple is a fascinating phenomenon. It rightly interests everyone; investors, economists, managers, consumers, and from the look of this thread, even those who it doesn't interest. :)
- jacquesm 12y ago> The charitable interpretation of his question would be and > I suspect the latter. Interesting to see how selective you are when using that charitable interpretation technique.