6 ms·

Ask HN: MBP or Thinkpad

15 points by notsony 12y ago

This same question was asked 8 years ago - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=150530 - when the T61p was the new kid on the block. Are Thinkpads still the best choice for programmers using Linux? Or does a MacBook Pro running virtual machines make for a better development environment? I don't use OS X much so I'm probably biased, but just from a hardware perspective, I feel the new range of 2015 Thinkpads with high resolution screens, 19-20hr battery life and the restoration of 3 physical buttons by the trackpoint are hard to beat. What are people in start-ups using these days?

dhruvbird 12y ago
Thinkpad personally, but I am the 2% not using a MBP I feel.
smt88 12y ago
I run Linux on my MBP. Because of Docker, I could never use OS X as my everyday dev OS anymore. I need native support. That said, I think you're paying an Apple premium for the MBP that isn't really worth it.
- natch 12y ago
  There is no Apple premium; that is a tired myth. You simply get a lot more, and you do pay for it. The MagSafe connector alone will save your laptop... and you don't need to hack it yourself with a Dremel and epoxy. Battery design and power management, unibody strength, big touchpad, beautiful sound system, Thunderbolt, resale value, hand-me-down value... when you factor everything in, MBP is a no brainer and it's the ThinkPad owners who end up overpaying.
  - collyw 12y ago
    It isn't a myth, it has been well documented that buying upgrades from the Apple site is significantly more expensive than elsewhere.
    - emocakes 12y ago
      only idiots buy upgrades from the apple store (unless its soldered on RAM like in the new mbp's).
    - natch 12y ago
      To be fair, we are talking about purchasing a new computer, not upgrading old ones. And I did acknowledge that Apple overcharges for memory. Owning a non-Apple computer, on the other hand, has other costs... https://bug1134506.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8566794 https://bug1134506.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=85...
natch 12y ago
Sounds like you really like the new ThinkPads. Linux will run on either machine. One thing to consider (countering my point elsewhere in the thread) while I don't believe Apple products are more expensive when all the features are considered, Apple sure does overcharge for one thing, and that is memory. So, depending on how much memory you want to get, that could make your decision. Linux runs fine in VMs for me on the laptops I've done this on, a 4GB MBP, 8GB air, and now 16GB MBP. I've met people running Linux directly on the metal as well and they seemed happy with it. How is Lenovo's driver support for features like power management and the trackpoint buttons you mention, is one thing I would want to ask if I were you.
- orkoden 12y ago
  And because you can't upgrade the RAM, get the biggest amount possible.
- notsony 12y ago
  In a Google hangout, the Thinkpad team imagined what their dream classic Thinkpad might be... rumor is that there might be a special edition Thinkpad next week to celebrate 100 million Thinkpads sold. http://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/2w1tiv/uleadorg_hints_something_big_is_coming_this_week/ http://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/2w1tiv/uleadorg_hi...
devnonymous 12y ago
I'd go with a thinkpad but then again, I prefer using linux (fedora specifically) as my base OS and VMs for dev work. IMHO, you can run more vms off linux on a TP than you can on a MBP. If your dev box is also going to be used for other stuff and you don't mind OSX, you might as well buy the MBP.
Sekas 12y ago
I attempted to install Ubuntu 14.10 x86_64 on the new X1 Carbon this weekend, and so far it has not worked straight out of the box. I am guessing it has to do with the i5500 gfx adapter, but it's all a guess until i figured out what went wrong.
- orkoden 12y ago
  For running Linux on laptops it's usually best to get last year's model. Then the software support will be there. I had to compile my own kernels for over a year, before Ubuntu supported my hardware out of the box.
lrei 12y ago
My lab uses mostly thinkpads with a few people having macbooks instead. I have have a thinkpad at work but bought a MB with my own money. So you know my choice. What I can say is that thinkpad hardware quality varies wildly with some having huge overheating problems (processors to max = system shutdown) while every macbook i have owned (including the air) being absolutely ok with 12h straight of having their cores to the max. Build quality of thinkpads is low-ish when compared to macbooks and they require more attention to cleaning and not being dropped. On the other hand MBs only offer up to 16GB memory which feels arcane and makes it impossible to do a lot of stuff. Apple being stingy with memory is typical across their product ranges. Generally having to run a VM is not something I like to do - unnecessary friction/user time overhead. But the MB is ok for running both native linux and running typical dev stuff on osx (though recent default compiler change to clang is anoying).
jhildings 12y ago
Thinkpad every day of the week, MPBs are horrible to do hardware maintenance on. You can also get static electric shocks from the chassi and they don't have a DVI/HDMI connection
- rasathus 12y ago
  They aren't particularly easy to take apart, but with todays hardware packing I'm not sure any of them are. But the MBP Retina I'm typing this on certainly has an HDMI connection.
  - jhildings 12y ago
    I haven't opened the "new" Thinkpads(with chiclet keyboard) , but the T200-series etc are very easy to maintain. For example, the memory slot is just one screw in a special hatch And guess i was wrong about the HDMI, I've only had MPBs with DisplayPort
- masida 12y ago
  Funny that you mention it, I've got static shocks from my MBP 2,1 quite often. Hated it. Switched to a ThinkPad and I'm happy working with a quad core T530 now. I've also tried the T540p, but I didn't like the trackpad at all. Also, I found the FHD screen from my T530 to be of better quality than the FHD screen of the T540p. Personally, I will never buy a Mac again.
  - pythonistic 12y ago
    I have a Lenovo T530 from work and personally owned 2013 Retina MacBook Pro. The things I don't like about the T530 are: * I miss keystrokes on the keyboard when typing and the quality is low. The laptop, cushioned in a bag, rolled from a chair onto the floor and the H key broke off: I superglued it back into place. * With my glasses prescription, the screen is difficult to read (chromatic abberation). A co-worker with the same model laptop experiences the same problem, and my manager also dislikes the screen on her T530. * Unlike ASUS and MSI laptops, there's no default keyboard option to disable the trackpad. I'll regularly and unexpectedly move the cursor or pointer when typing. Otherwise, the hardware was well supported in Linux (RHEL 6.5, company standard, with NVidia drivers) and even with an older Linux, the battery life is reasonable. For software development I use an external 26" monitor and a mechnical keyboard to get around my gripes. I much prefer the keyboard and screen on my three year-old T420s, and do much of my daily non-development work and all my personal programming on the MacBook.
mjankowski 12y ago
If you are a developer compare the screens - my T420 is pain for the eyes and the screen ratio sucks for coding. My next PC is going to be MBP or MS Surface Pro. No more crappy screens.
- orkoden 12y ago
  Screen, keyboard and touchpad are super important. It's what you use most in a laptop after all. Lenovo offers different screens for the same models. Be careful to pick the better one.
  - notsony 12y ago
    I found that using a trackpoint and 3 physical buttons has eliminated any carpal tunnel like pains in my hands. While the touchpad on MBPs is nice, I found clicking a button which isn't a button quite stressful on the hands. Also, moving my hand to the touchpad and then back up to the ASDF-JKL; typing position is uncomfortable having gotten used to just moving one finger to the trackpoint. The trackpoint does have one major flaw though - drift. Sometimes, it seems to move itself and you have to correct it. Apparently there is some kind of calibration going on, but it's quite annoying and I wish/hope there is some kind of fix.
showsover 12y ago
I was also looking for a new laptop, and bought my first mac a week ago. It's a bit more expensive (bought apple care too), but I hope it'll be worth the price. I picked the MBP because of the screen / resolution, batterij, and the hinges. Wobbly screens make me go bananas. A comparable laptop makes you choose between either screen or battery, for about the same price.
- robflynn 12y ago
  I am happy with my MBP. I used other laptops previously and they seemed to crap out on me more often than I thought they should. The MBP has been reliable for a few years now. Like others below said, YMMV.
kweinber 12y ago
For most, tbis really comes down to: which OS do you want to run commercial software on, Windows or Mac OSX? Even though you'll try to stay pure linux, there is always that pesky need to open a contract in Word or a photoshop file and you have to dual-boot or vm to do it. I personally prefer thinkpad hardware by a country mile but I chose a Mac for software compatibility reasons. If I could run commercial software on linux, I'd be on Linux full-stop.
davidy123 12y ago
Thinkpads are a large range, from the inexpensive business line to their workstation line, each often having multiple display options. I've only ever had the first Intel Macbook Pro, which really had heat and noise problems and I didn't like a few other Mac things about it. Other than that I've been running Linux on Thinkpads and not had any problems. Battery life is good these days and I'm a Trackpoint fan, once you get used to it, it is precise, excellent for scrolling and you never have to leave the home row. Some of the decisions Lenovo made in the last generation 30 series were alarming, but they seem to be more conscious of the value of Thinkpad's name to experts now and how that's tied in with overall image. They should however find a way to go back to two memory slots, some models only accept 8 or 12GB now, whereas they used to accept 16.
- notsony 12y ago
  I think there are too many models. I just came across the L range, which is basically the same as the T range but cheaper and slightly bigger, but not by much. What's funny is that this L range can have 16 GB ram whereas the much nicer X range can't because it has to comply with Intel's requirements (I believe of 8GB max) in order to be labelled an Ultrabook.
  - nrr 12y ago
    You know, I had always wondered why, despite having 16GB of RAM in my X230 (and having had 16GB in my X301), the newer X240 and X250 models are capped at 8GB. Knowing that it's an Intel marketing thing certainly clears up my confusion. Unfortunately, this means that people like me who prefer powerful laptops in a smaller form factor are pretty much limited to the retina MBPs now.
  - SamReidHughes 12y ago
    There's no way that "8GB max" is an Ultrabook requirement.
chrisbennet 12y ago
I make my living with my laptop and I've used both. I prefer the MBP but I'm a Windows programmer so YMMV. Yes, they are expensive but they seem to last a little longer than the Thinkpads. I think the Thinkpads used to be a professional class machine but I think they are coasting on their old reputation now. We had several fail (screens mostly) in a 3 person shop where I worked. At some point, the cost of the hardware pales in comparison to the downtime you would experience if your machine failed. I haven't had any problems with my (less than 2 years old) MBP Retina but I had a few things fail over the 7 years I had the previous MBP. I had a video board fail and I took it down to the Apple store and got it fixed in a day or two. I replaced the hard drives and fans myself as it got older. Another thing in favor of the MBP in customer facing situations is the screen. For demonstrating GUI's and graphics the MBP screen just looks good - though it was a lot better when they had 17" screens.
japhyr 12y ago
One thing I rarely see mentioned in these discussions is your proximity to an Apple store. Macbooks are great as long as they just work. But when they stop working, life sucks if you can't walk your machine into an Apple store. Most of us use our machines every day, and it's pretty hard to mail your computer away for a month of service. I'd consider a macbook more seriously if I lived anywhere near an Apple store. Fortunately I'm quite happy on a Thinkpad (T430s currently).
sreenadh 12y ago
My pick is Thinkpad. As I am a windows user trying to move to Linux Mint TP is the obvious choice. But the main reason is the keyboard which is just perfect. I also love the red joy-stick like device for some quick use. Now for the things I hate about TP. The body is cheapish plastic since Lenovo took it over and its not comfortable when you use the laptop for long. The lack of official driver support for Linux is another this that pisses me off.
xena 12y ago
If you are programming things that will only ever run in OSX, use a mac. If you are programming things that will run on linux, don't fuck around and get a thinkpad.
Mr_OK 12y ago
I have a MBP, 8GB, 2014 now and I'm happy. I also have a thinkpad t500 but it has a dual core so you can't compare it. The thinkpad is more of a rough notebook for a FabLab or when you are on the road and it can get dirty. The MBP is lighter and very powerful considering its size. OS X works like a charm for me and I've been through many different OS'es so far (Win XP/7, Ubuntu, Debian, Manjaro,...). It provides most of the stuff I need for working, photoshop runs out of the box and some of the Mac tools are very handy. But I wouldn't trust OS X for security means. Therefor I'd use a TP with Linux. I would use this for things like online-banking and private stuff.

15 points by notsony 12y ago

dhruvbird 12y ago

Thinkpad personally, but I am the 2% not using a MBP I feel.

smt88 12y ago

I run Linux on my MBP. Because of Docker, I could never use OS X as my everyday dev OS anymore. I need native support. That said, I think you're paying an Apple premium for the MBP that isn't really worth it.

natch 12y ago
There is no Apple premium; that is a tired myth. You simply get a lot more, and you do pay for it. The MagSafe connector alone will save your laptop... and you don't need to hack it yourself with a Dremel and epoxy. Battery design and power management, unibody strength, big touchpad, beautiful sound system, Thunderbolt, resale value, hand-me-down value... when you factor everything in, MBP is a no brainer and it's the ThinkPad owners who end up overpaying.
- collyw 12y ago
  It isn't a myth, it has been well documented that buying upgrades from the Apple site is significantly more expensive than elsewhere.
  - emocakes 12y ago
    only idiots buy upgrades from the apple store (unless its soldered on RAM like in the new mbp's).
  - natch 12y ago
    To be fair, we are talking about purchasing a new computer, not upgrading old ones. And I did acknowledge that Apple overcharges for memory. Owning a non-Apple computer, on the other hand, has other costs... https://bug1134506.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8566794 https://bug1134506.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=85...

natch 12y ago

Sounds like you really like the new ThinkPads. Linux will run on either machine. One thing to consider (countering my point elsewhere in the thread) while I don't believe Apple products are more expensive when all the features are considered, Apple sure does overcharge for one thing, and that is memory. So, depending on how much memory you want to get, that could make your decision. Linux runs fine in VMs for me on the laptops I've done this on, a 4GB MBP, 8GB air, and now 16GB MBP. I've met people running Linux directly on the metal as well and they seemed happy with it. How is Lenovo's driver support for features like power management and the trackpoint buttons you mention, is one thing I would want to ask if I were you.

orkoden 12y ago
And because you can't upgrade the RAM, get the biggest amount possible.
notsony 12y ago
In a Google hangout, the Thinkpad team imagined what their dream classic Thinkpad might be... rumor is that there might be a special edition Thinkpad next week to celebrate 100 million Thinkpads sold. http://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/2w1tiv/uleadorg_hints_something_big_is_coming_this_week/ http://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/2w1tiv/uleadorg_hi...

devnonymous 12y ago

I'd go with a thinkpad but then again, I prefer using linux (fedora specifically) as my base OS and VMs for dev work. IMHO, you can run more vms off linux on a TP than you can on a MBP. If your dev box is also going to be used for other stuff and you don't mind OSX, you might as well buy the MBP.

Sekas 12y ago

I attempted to install Ubuntu 14.10 x86_64 on the new X1 Carbon this weekend, and so far it has not worked straight out of the box. I am guessing it has to do with the i5500 gfx adapter, but it's all a guess until i figured out what went wrong.

orkoden 12y ago
For running Linux on laptops it's usually best to get last year's model. Then the software support will be there. I had to compile my own kernels for over a year, before Ubuntu supported my hardware out of the box.

lrei 12y ago

My lab uses mostly thinkpads with a few people having macbooks instead. I have have a thinkpad at work but bought a MB with my own money. So you know my choice. What I can say is that thinkpad hardware quality varies wildly with some having huge overheating problems (processors to max = system shutdown) while every macbook i have owned (including the air) being absolutely ok with 12h straight of having their cores to the max. Build quality of thinkpads is low-ish when compared to macbooks and they require more attention to cleaning and not being dropped. On the other hand MBs only offer up to 16GB memory which feels arcane and makes it impossible to do a lot of stuff. Apple being stingy with memory is typical across their product ranges. Generally having to run a VM is not something I like to do - unnecessary friction/user time overhead. But the MB is ok for running both native linux and running typical dev stuff on osx (though recent default compiler change to clang is anoying).

jhildings 12y ago

Thinkpad every day of the week, MPBs are horrible to do hardware maintenance on. You can also get static electric shocks from the chassi and they don't have a DVI/HDMI connection

rasathus 12y ago
They aren't particularly easy to take apart, but with todays hardware packing I'm not sure any of them are. But the MBP Retina I'm typing this on certainly has an HDMI connection.
- jhildings 12y ago
  I haven't opened the "new" Thinkpads(with chiclet keyboard) , but the T200-series etc are very easy to maintain. For example, the memory slot is just one screw in a special hatch And guess i was wrong about the HDMI, I've only had MPBs with DisplayPort
masida 12y ago
Funny that you mention it, I've got static shocks from my MBP 2,1 quite often. Hated it. Switched to a ThinkPad and I'm happy working with a quad core T530 now. I've also tried the T540p, but I didn't like the trackpad at all. Also, I found the FHD screen from my T530 to be of better quality than the FHD screen of the T540p. Personally, I will never buy a Mac again.
- pythonistic 12y ago
  I have a Lenovo T530 from work and personally owned 2013 Retina MacBook Pro. The things I don't like about the T530 are: * I miss keystrokes on the keyboard when typing and the quality is low. The laptop, cushioned in a bag, rolled from a chair onto the floor and the H key broke off: I superglued it back into place. * With my glasses prescription, the screen is difficult to read (chromatic abberation). A co-worker with the same model laptop experiences the same problem, and my manager also dislikes the screen on her T530. * Unlike ASUS and MSI laptops, there's no default keyboard option to disable the trackpad. I'll regularly and unexpectedly move the cursor or pointer when typing. Otherwise, the hardware was well supported in Linux (RHEL 6.5, company standard, with NVidia drivers) and even with an older Linux, the battery life is reasonable. For software development I use an external 26" monitor and a mechnical keyboard to get around my gripes. I much prefer the keyboard and screen on my three year-old T420s, and do much of my daily non-development work and all my personal programming on the MacBook.

mjankowski 12y ago

If you are a developer compare the screens - my T420 is pain for the eyes and the screen ratio sucks for coding. My next PC is going to be MBP or MS Surface Pro. No more crappy screens.

orkoden 12y ago
Screen, keyboard and touchpad are super important. It's what you use most in a laptop after all. Lenovo offers different screens for the same models. Be careful to pick the better one.
- notsony 12y ago
  I found that using a trackpoint and 3 physical buttons has eliminated any carpal tunnel like pains in my hands. While the touchpad on MBPs is nice, I found clicking a button which isn't a button quite stressful on the hands. Also, moving my hand to the touchpad and then back up to the ASDF-JKL; typing position is uncomfortable having gotten used to just moving one finger to the trackpoint. The trackpoint does have one major flaw though - drift. Sometimes, it seems to move itself and you have to correct it. Apparently there is some kind of calibration going on, but it's quite annoying and I wish/hope there is some kind of fix.

showsover 12y ago

I was also looking for a new laptop, and bought my first mac a week ago. It's a bit more expensive (bought apple care too), but I hope it'll be worth the price. I picked the MBP because of the screen / resolution, batterij, and the hinges. Wobbly screens make me go bananas. A comparable laptop makes you choose between either screen or battery, for about the same price.

robflynn 12y ago
I am happy with my MBP. I used other laptops previously and they seemed to crap out on me more often than I thought they should. The MBP has been reliable for a few years now. Like others below said, YMMV.

kweinber 12y ago

For most, tbis really comes down to: which OS do you want to run commercial software on, Windows or Mac OSX? Even though you'll try to stay pure linux, there is always that pesky need to open a contract in Word or a photoshop file and you have to dual-boot or vm to do it. I personally prefer thinkpad hardware by a country mile but I chose a Mac for software compatibility reasons. If I could run commercial software on linux, I'd be on Linux full-stop.

davidy123 12y ago

Thinkpads are a large range, from the inexpensive business line to their workstation line, each often having multiple display options. I've only ever had the first Intel Macbook Pro, which really had heat and noise problems and I didn't like a few other Mac things about it. Other than that I've been running Linux on Thinkpads and not had any problems. Battery life is good these days and I'm a Trackpoint fan, once you get used to it, it is precise, excellent for scrolling and you never have to leave the home row. Some of the decisions Lenovo made in the last generation 30 series were alarming, but they seem to be more conscious of the value of Thinkpad's name to experts now and how that's tied in with overall image. They should however find a way to go back to two memory slots, some models only accept 8 or 12GB now, whereas they used to accept 16.

notsony 12y ago
I think there are too many models. I just came across the L range, which is basically the same as the T range but cheaper and slightly bigger, but not by much. What's funny is that this L range can have 16 GB ram whereas the much nicer X range can't because it has to comply with Intel's requirements (I believe of 8GB max) in order to be labelled an Ultrabook.
- nrr 12y ago
  You know, I had always wondered why, despite having 16GB of RAM in my X230 (and having had 16GB in my X301), the newer X240 and X250 models are capped at 8GB. Knowing that it's an Intel marketing thing certainly clears up my confusion. Unfortunately, this means that people like me who prefer powerful laptops in a smaller form factor are pretty much limited to the retina MBPs now.
- SamReidHughes 12y ago
  There's no way that "8GB max" is an Ultrabook requirement.

chrisbennet 12y ago

I make my living with my laptop and I've used both. I prefer the MBP but I'm a Windows programmer so YMMV. Yes, they are expensive but they seem to last a little longer than the Thinkpads. I think the Thinkpads used to be a professional class machine but I think they are coasting on their old reputation now. We had several fail (screens mostly) in a 3 person shop where I worked. At some point, the cost of the hardware pales in comparison to the downtime you would experience if your machine failed. I haven't had any problems with my (less than 2 years old) MBP Retina but I had a few things fail over the 7 years I had the previous MBP. I had a video board fail and I took it down to the Apple store and got it fixed in a day or two. I replaced the hard drives and fans myself as it got older. Another thing in favor of the MBP in customer facing situations is the screen. For demonstrating GUI's and graphics the MBP screen just looks good - though it was a lot better when they had 17" screens.

japhyr 12y ago

One thing I rarely see mentioned in these discussions is your proximity to an Apple store. Macbooks are great as long as they just work. But when they stop working, life sucks if you can't walk your machine into an Apple store. Most of us use our machines every day, and it's pretty hard to mail your computer away for a month of service. I'd consider a macbook more seriously if I lived anywhere near an Apple store. Fortunately I'm quite happy on a Thinkpad (T430s currently).

sreenadh 12y ago

My pick is Thinkpad. As I am a windows user trying to move to Linux Mint TP is the obvious choice. But the main reason is the keyboard which is just perfect. I also love the red joy-stick like device for some quick use. Now for the things I hate about TP. The body is cheapish plastic since Lenovo took it over and its not comfortable when you use the laptop for long. The lack of official driver support for Linux is another this that pisses me off.

xena 12y ago

If you are programming things that will only ever run in OSX, use a mac. If you are programming things that will run on linux, don't fuck around and get a thinkpad.

Mr_OK 12y ago

I have a MBP, 8GB, 2014 now and I'm happy. I also have a thinkpad t500 but it has a dual core so you can't compare it. The thinkpad is more of a rough notebook for a FabLab or when you are on the road and it can get dirty. The MBP is lighter and very powerful considering its size. OS X works like a charm for me and I've been through many different OS'es so far (Win XP/7, Ubuntu, Debian, Manjaro,...). It provides most of the stuff I need for working, photoshop runs out of the box and some of the Mac tools are very handy. But I wouldn't trust OS X for security means. Therefor I'd use a TP with Linux. I would use this for things like online-banking and private stuff.