> How about an ownerless ... Are you intentionally changing the subject, or do you equate self ownership to "ownerless"? Or is it that you are skipping ahead

> How about an ownerless ... Are you intentionally changing the subject, or do you equate self ownership to "ownerless"? Or is it that you are skipping ahead logically because you don't recognize a non-human entity as being capable of self ownership? If that is the case, that is the more important issue that needs to be discussed.