4 ms·
I'll note that, at least in business, some research indicates that women do not earn less than men: "Women executives who do not have children follow career pat
by req2 17y ago
I'll note that, at least in business, some research indicates that women do not earn less than men:
"Women executives who do not have children follow career paths that closely replicate those of their male peers. Successful M.B.A. couples have similar work patterns, said Dr. Bertrand. Women without children married to high-earning spouses are just as likely to work and accumulate post-M.B.A. work experience at an almost identical rate, she said. Call a woman without a child a man."
Rather, they work less than men:
"When women executives return to the office, after several months of absence, they typically start to work shorter hours, the study shows: 52 hours per week, compared with an average 58 hours for their male peers, as they adapt to their new double task."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/business/global/29iht-riedgenper.html http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/business/global/29iht-ried...
This is not brushing away the problem, but pointing out that wages are a symptom of an underlying cause.
- gaius 17y agoEqual pay for equal work, I absolutely believe in, but it goes both ways. Taking a year off - for any reason, for anyone - should mean forfeiting a year's seniority and pay. The truth is that men have always had to choose and to compromise between work and domestic life, there are many men who rarely see their kids not because they don't love them but because they need to earn to give their kids a good start in life. Incidentally here in the UK, deputy PM Harriet Harman (known as Harriet Harperson as she's so PC) had her figures on pay savaged by the National Audit Office - she compared pro rata salaries of women working part-time to those of men working full-time.
- gruseom 17y agodeputy PM Harriet Harman (known as Harriet Harperson as she's so PC) What a delicious sample of British wit.