3 ms·
Checkout pfSense - have used it for years after trying m0n0wall. The recommended path forward, OPNSense, is a fork of pfSense. I have not tried it, and I get
by dstroot 12y ago
Checkout pfSense - have used it for years after trying m0n0wall. The recommended path forward, OPNSense, is a fork of pfSense. I have not tried it, and I get their reasons for forking and many of the improvements they are making are really, really needed - BUT the community isn't there yet where pfSense has a thriving community behind it.
- gonzo 12y agoI dont understand their reasons for forking.
- otoburb 12y agoIf one of the active pfSense developers is asking this question[1], then Manuel Kasper's OPNsense endorsement is certainly confusing without additional context. Without a doubt, the endorsement certainly carries weight given m0n0wall's impact and legacy over the years. [1] https://www.pfsense.org/about-pfsense/development-team.html https://www.pfsense.org/about-pfsense/development-team.html
- gonzo 12y agoOutside of Manuel himself, no single person has put as much time and effort into m0n0wall as Chris Buechler has. Chris wrote most of what's on doc.m0n0.ch, and has by far the highest post count to the m0n0wall list. Chris also had a source commit bit. We host doc.m0n0.ch to this day. Chris is honestly baffled by what Manuel wrote. It feels like a slap in the face.