3 ms·
Well that code seems pretty readable to me and appears to preserve some interesting properties of the original paper as mentioned below the source :) As far as
by swannodette 12y ago
Well that code seems pretty readable to me and appears to preserve some interesting properties of the original paper as mentioned below the source :)
As far as spending more time reading Clojure than writing it I experience this myself - and I'm pretty sure this isn't a bad thing.
- kaffeinecoma 12y agoI meant that in general, we as programmers will spend more time reading (our, others') code than writing it. Nature of the business. Did not mean to imply this was a bad thing. When I consider adopting a language, part of that consideration is how well I can read others' idiomatic code. It's so important for understanding libraries. I'm still just having a hard time with Clojure. I know it clicks for a lot of people though.
- Flow 12y agoPerhaps readable if you read a lot of Clojure, but hardly anything that is easy to test piece by piece inspecting intermediate data, using a REPL for example.