3 ms·
This has nothing to do with "accumulating crud", it's a trivial thing, there's probably less code needed to not treat 0.0.0.0 differently. Also, the amount of p
by ambrop7 12y ago
This has nothing to do with "accumulating crud", it's a trivial thing, there's probably less code needed to not treat 0.0.0.0 differently. Also, the amount of people who have ever typed 0.0.0.0 into a browser is so small that it is virtually irrelevant what they do, and whether there is consistency between browsers.
- belovedeagle 12y agoBut this is treating 0.0.0.0 differently. Did you not read the bug report, or the comments here, or anything? 0.0.0.0 is not a valid address. In fact, navigating to 127.0.0.1 when 0.0.0.0 is given in the URL is neither expected nor desirable.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]