Thank you – I genuinely appreciate the clarification. Yes, I'm assuming an individual who has finite (but possibly significant) resources. Let's assume s/he wa

Thank you – I genuinely appreciate the clarification. Yes, I'm assuming an individual who has finite (but possibly significant) resources. Let's assume s/he wants to do as much good as s/he can. Who determines whether some proposed action is sufficiently good, so as to allow them to take that action? In your view, should it be left up to the individual, who wishes to give, or should the decision be someone else's? For example, if Bill & Melinda Gates wanted to donate a great deal of money to help the poor, would you say that someone other than Bill and Melinda had a right to say how their resources may be distributed?