3 ms·
I think the number of companies taking free software and making meaningful changes that they don't contribute back to the community is not that big at all, thou
by click170 12y ago
I think the number of companies taking free software and making meaningful changes that they don't contribute back to the community is not that big at all, though I don't argue that some probably do exist.
Consider the overhead involved in maintaining and packaging your own code base while still including updates from origin. Wouldn't it be much easier to submit a merge request so that you could just apt-get install the package and not worry about your own custom branch, not to mention feedback on your change from a much wider audience who are familiar with that code base? And then there's the fact that you're exposing yourself to liability that, again, would be solved by that merge request. It just seems like a lot of the ones that do, do it out of ignorance rather than malice.
I don't disagree that companies need to build up assets, but I think for most companies including SaaS ones, those assets are systems which are comprised of unmodified FOSS software used in [sometimes not] innovative ways.
- EmanueleAina 12y agoThat may be the case now that FLOSS is worldwide renowed and people are starting to realize that private forks are costly, but it wasn't always so. The GPL was instrumental in forcing people to behave when nobody knew what to do, and it has been so successful that now people expect the behaviour enforced by it even when using more permissive licenses.