4 ms·
For a whole lot of people, I think it's safe to say that the answer is yes: the deal is unbearable. I personally would not bother putting videos online if I had
by pjscott 12y ago
For a whole lot of people, I think it's safe to say that the answer is yes: the deal is unbearable. I personally would not bother putting videos online if I had to go through some closed captioning hassle, and I doubt I'm particularly special here.
You can argue that people ought to be okay with the extra effort of closed captioning, but don't mistake that for an argument that they will be.
- sp332 12y agoHow do you defend that attitude to all the deaf people out there who want to know what you put in your video and can't?
- loco5niner 12y agoNot OP, but I would defend it with something similar to his statement above. Basically, I want to get the content out, and the extra effort (if required) would be enough for me to say basically "forget it". I'd rather get the content out and have a small subset of people not be able to access it, than not get it out at all. Certainly, there are other ways to make content available to specific user groups that requiring the original content creator to build it in from the beginning.
- pjscott 12y agoI don't defend it. Why would I? I have taken on no obligation here.
- murbard2 12y agoHow do you defend not paying from your own pocket to caption all the non captioned content out there? The creator of a video has no more of an obligation towards the deaf than anyone else.