> suggesting that Go popularized typeclasses smacks of fanboyism I'm not exactly a fan of Go nor am I a fanboy, quite the opposite these days. I don't have to

> suggesting that Go popularized typeclasses smacks of fanboyism I'm not exactly a fan of Go nor am I a fanboy, quite the opposite these days. I don't have to like go to mention that the way interfaces are used kind of accomplish the same thing as typeclasses. I also feel that (sadly) Go is more popular than Haskell. Partially because of the number of Haskell programmers I've encountered in real life is much lower than the number of Go programmers I've encountered.