4 ms·
A precedent that big institutions aren't allowed to shut out disabled people? Sounds like a pretty reasonable precedent to me.
by kryptiskt 12y ago
A precedent that big institutions aren't allowed to shut out disabled people? Sounds like a pretty reasonable precedent to me.
- hullo 12y agoWow to the downvotes on this. Leaving aside their toxic personal politics, they don't even know how to use the site. (This one can be correctly downvoted as meta)
- kryptiskt 12y agoI don't mind the downvotes really, it's kinda interesting to see how the wind blows. But damn, must it be frustrating to be deaf and see how how little thought goes in that direction, compared to the tears shed for Harvard ($32B endowment 2013) and MIT ($11B endowment 2013).
- icebraining 12y agoNot everyone stands by the side they consider more sympathetic; some people actually try to be impartial and apply judgment based on their principles, whether they benefit a big institution or a poor person. That doesn't mean we must agree with those principles, of course.