> it's just a lot harder to right a self-interpreter in lambda calc. Here's one for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_lambda_calculus http://en.wikipedia

> it's just a lot harder to right a self-interpreter in lambda calc. Here's one for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_lambda_calculus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_lambda_calculus, all of 29 bytes long, including parsing: 0101000110100000000101011000000000011110000101111110011110 0001011100111100000011110000101101101110011111000011111000 0101111010011101001011001110000110110000101111100001111100 0011100110111101111100111101110110000110010001101000011010