4 ms·
The article doesn't specify who is suing them, whether it's a MOOC user or an enrolled student, and what lectures they're suing over. There's a big difference b
by psychometry 12y ago
The article doesn't specify who is suing them, whether it's a MOOC user or an enrolled student, and what lectures they're suing over. There's a big difference between a MOOC lecture lacking captions and required online lecture for an undergraduate course lacking caption.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- lovelearning 12y agoAll public online videos published by Harvard and MIT, including such gems as "video of students welcoming Lady Gaga to the Harvard campus". [1]: http://nad.org/news/2015/2/nad-sues-harvard-and-mit-discrimination-public-online-content http://nad.org/news/2015/2/nad-sues-harvard-and-mit-discrimi...
- rtkwe 12y agoIt sounds like it's talking about their MOOC offerings but it very ambiguous and could really be either.
- extra88 12y agoNone of the plaintiffs are enrolled students, the suit is only about videos offered for free to the public. Enrolled students with disabilities (not just in degree programs but also those in single continuing ed. courses) do receive accommodations like captioning for course videos.