3 ms·
It wasn't prohibited - this was 2002, and they were only just getting up to speed with this internet thing. It wasn't exactly work that could have easily been p
by madaxe_again 12y ago
It wasn't prohibited - this was 2002, and they were only just getting up to speed with this internet thing. It wasn't exactly work that could have easily been plagiarised - 20,000 word research paper on Minkowski, Kaluza-Klein, etc.
I had no revenge, I just ended up with a worse than hoped for degree, a deeper distrust of authority, and utter contempt for university "education", which would be better described as "conformation".
- wsxcde 12y agoDo you really think that what you did was acceptable? It's equivalent to putting up your essay on a public notice board. Do you think the latter would've been acceptable behavior? Maybe the punishment was a little harsh, but I think it'd be hard to argue you weren't in the wrong. > a deeper distrust of authority, and utter contempt for university "education", which would be better described as "conformation" Based on what you've said so far, to me you sound immature and are rationalizing your immaturity by blaming "the system."
- madaxe_again 12y agoI think it was perfectly acceptable, yes. I wrote a paper on a topic of my choice, I handed it in, and I then posted it to my site, as a blog post. There was nothing that prohibited this, and I had posted data (astronomical observations & images) and assignments to my site for years previous to this incident. Frankly, I would suggest that your thinking is extremely immature, if your first course of action is to call someone else immature, and to respect all authority unquestioningly - shows a lack of development of thought, and an absence of critical thinking.