4 ms·
Why should this be a property of the IDE and not the language itself? No, seriously. If the language sucks but your interaction with the IDE is fine, why not h
by superuser2 12y ago
Why should this be a property of the IDE and not the language itself?
No, seriously. If the language sucks but your interaction with the IDE is fine, why not have a language that is closer to your interaction with the IDE to begin with, and use a text editor?
- mercurial 12y agoIt's the old "verbose getter and setters are not a problem because I can generate them in Eclipse" argument. To some extent, over-reliance on an IDE indicates issues with your language of choice, just like the overuse of design patterns.
- mateuszf 12y agoIt is property of the language - type annotations. Yes - maybe types can be infered, but I haven't seen any IDE with good refactorings for languages without types annotations (smalltalk doesn't count).