3 ms·
I see driverless cars removing the need to own a personal car (within urban environments). Some people unfortunately want the private space that a car provides
by awjr 12y ago
I see driverless cars removing the need to own a personal car (within urban environments). Some people unfortunately want the private space that a car provides to them.
Driverless cars enable better car pooling. "Would you be happy sharing your journey and reducing your charge by 50%/66%/75%"
I see entrenched taxi firms having a massive issue with these.
Note I've assumed that it would be legal to have a car drive around without a person in the driving seat able to take control. However I think this is a critical legal point to get to to make driverless cars a persuasive transport solution.
- UnoriginalGuy 12y ago> I see driverless cars removing the need to own a personal car (within urban environments). Some people unfortunately want the private space that a car provides to them. It isn't that so much as... People will vandalise shared cars. Write on the walls, spill stuff and leave it, vomit, etc. This is less of a problem on manned public transport (e.g. buses, trains, etc) since there is an authority figure to limit it. So best case scenario they install cameras to stop the vandalism, but that then means you're being watched all of the time which is a little uncomfortable, when in a legitimately driverless car you could have actual privacy in theory. I think an employer provided driverless car system is believable. Essentially your employer scraps car parks, and then sends out its fleet of cars to pick up employees at home and brings them in. It is unlikely employees would vandalise the cars.