6 ms·

Ask HN: Which Linux distribution you are currently using?

6 points by zyngaro 12y ago

duncan_bayne 12y ago
Linux Mint (Cinnamon) - see also https://github.com/duncan-bayne/mint-setup https://github.com/duncan-bayne/mint-setup
DevFactor 12y ago
Linux Mint (Cinnamon). Was on Ubuntu, but found that I was much more productive on Mint - as Ubuntu has become too feature rich and I don't use most of what they offer. Mint has been a great platform for rails development, easily integrating with all the test and dev tools I needed.
AlbertoCG 12y ago
Ubuntu 14.04, testing the 15.04 on VM. Also run Kali and Tails on USB sticks for some researching.
o0-0o 12y ago
Debian (Wheezy)
nickysielicki 12y ago
When I use linux (as opposed to BSD), I use Arch Linux. I don't recommend it to everyone, but it's by far the best linux distribution for me.
itg 12y ago
Used Ubuntu for a while, now mostly Arch Linux
paulrpotts 12y ago
I used Ubuntu on several generations of home-built boxes, the most recent a Xeon on an Intel motherboard, but Ubuntu has reduced compatibility with my motherboard's video. I just moved to Fedora Server 21 and left the GUI off altogether. We'll see how that goes... I have a lot of apt-get commands in muscle memory.
- jrgifford 12y ago
  Yeah, the times I've tried to use CentOS or Fedora have always been full of "apt-get" in my bash history. :(
ljk 12y ago
#! - http://crunchbang.org/ http://crunchbang.org/
- stevekemp 12y ago
  Do you have plans for an alternative now that development has ceased? (http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=416493#p416493 http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=416493#p41649...)
  - ljk 12y ago
    I didn't even know about that, but I'll keep using it till my computer falls apart!
zwiteof 12y ago
I'm using Korora with Cinnamon, but I've been playing with i3 window manager lately to replace the desktop.
jrgifford 12y ago
Until I figure out my nvidia drivers for my laptop, Ubuntu 14.04 on a VPS.
deleted 12y ago
[deleted]
WillNotDownvote 12y ago
Ubuntu 14.04 on my laptop. I stayed on 10.04 as long as I could, but eventually the lack of support for Chrome and so on convinced me to update. Plus I have 14.04 running on all the servers where I have a choice.
johnny22 12y ago
Fedora 21 almost everywhere.
panchjanya 12y ago
Fedora 21, SL 6.1
alltakendamned 12y ago
Xubuntu 14.04.1 LTS, running on a Dell XPS 13
feybay 12y ago
Arch. I just started using it a few weeks ago for development purposes and it blows the socks off of every other OS I have ever used in almost every way (besides the initial install).
Joona 12y ago
Latest Debian netinstall if I do use Linux.
haidrali 12y ago
Ubuntu 12.
sejje 12y ago
Ubuntu, but w/ fluxbox.
brickcap 12y ago
I am using xubuntu(14.10). I like it because it is small,fast and supports ubuntu packages.
andyn 12y ago
Not an answer, but people who are using Mint; is there an official upgrade path between releases yet? How do you upgrade?
- sfilipov 12y ago
  All Mint point releases (17, 17.1, 17.2) are going to use Ubuntu 14.04 as a base. That means upgrading Mint 17 is low risk task until Mint 18 is released in 2016 (based on Ubuntu 16.04). Also expect Mint Debian Edition based on Debian 8.0 (Jessie) to be released later this year. Currently the Debian edition of Mint is rolling release but the developers have agreed that starting with Jessie, they will use only stable releases to base their version on.
brudgers 12y ago
Ubuntu Studio 14.04 because: + the Ubuntu ecosystem is well supported, in particularAskUbuntu on StackExchange. + The Studio flavor comes with software that's cool even what I don't use, and the little I have used would have been hard to identify and select in my state of ignorance...it's pretty much the case that having audio and video tools is the only reason I've used them. + I personally don't like the way stock Ubuntu works (in little ways) and don't want to invest in configuration at this point in my life.
iends 12y ago
Ubuntu 14.04
carise 12y ago
Debian Wheezy at home (I learned Linux on Debian, so I guess it's kind of habit when I pick a distro); CentOS 6.6 at work. After hearing a few things about Arch, though, I will give that a try. :)
DanBC 12y ago
I am using Fedora20. I have unusual reasons - my 2009 Macbook Pro os broken such that booting OSX or the MacOS install disc will cause hard reboot very quickly. The efi boot-install of Fedora also crashes the machine; the bios boot uses a different graphics card and doesn't crash the machine. (The Plymouth boot logo is garbled and boot takes an age but it works). (I only think it's a broken graphics adaptor. I'd happily try any fault-finding that people suggest. ) I have strongly negative opinions of Fedora and I will never ever install it on any other system. I'm preparing to move over to Arch.
paramk 12y ago
Ubuntu 14.04
daw___ 12y ago
ArchLinux[0] with no desktop environment and openbox[1] as the window manager with a few custom keyboard shortcuts to launch every day use applications (xterm, sublime text, internet browser, bashrun2[2] (an application launcher)). Pros: - it uses ~80MB on idle out of 3GB of RAM with my setup - the wiki[3] covers everything you need to know to install, maintain and troubleshoot your box - community-driven packages repository[4] where you can find nearly everything and it's always up-to-date - great package manager[5] Cons: - installation process is not straightforward and there is no wizard for initial configuration. It personally took me a couple of attempts before managing to install AL on a machine with a UEFI motherboard - systemd [0] ArchLinux https://www.archlinux.org/ https://www.archlinux.org/ [1] Openbox http://openbox.org/wiki/Main_Page http://openbox.org/wiki/Main_Page [2] bashrun2 https://code.google.com/p/bashrun2/ https://code.google.com/p/bashrun2/ [3] Wiki https://wiki.archlinux.org/ https://wiki.archlinux.org/ [4] Arch User Repository https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository [5] Pacman https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/pacman https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/pacman
dllthomas 12y ago
Ubuntu, with a pretty customized setup.
auxym 12y ago
lubuntu right now because my current pc is an old laptop (c2d, 2gb), works well enough. In the past I've used manjaro with xfce and OpenSUSE with KDE. I've found manjaro quite a good compromise between a bare arch install that requires hours and hours of configuration, and a more 'full-featured' distro, which in my experience with OpenSUSE, felt a bit bloated. The good about these three is you have good access to community-driven packages, PPAs in the ubuntu ecosystem, the AUR is absolutely great (manjaro is arch-based), and for suse you can find most things through the Open Build System

6 points by zyngaro 12y ago

Linux Mint (Cinnamon) - see also https://github.com/duncan-bayne/mint-setup https://github.com/duncan-bayne/mint-setup

Linux Mint (Cinnamon). Was on Ubuntu, but found that I was much more productive on Mint - as Ubuntu has become too feature rich and I don't use most of what they offer. Mint has been a great platform for rails development, easily integrating with all the test and dev tools I needed.

AlbertoCG 12y ago

Ubuntu 14.04, testing the 15.04 on VM. Also run Kali and Tails on USB sticks for some researching.

o0-0o 12y ago

Debian (Wheezy)

nickysielicki 12y ago

When I use linux (as opposed to BSD), I use Arch Linux. I don't recommend it to everyone, but it's by far the best linux distribution for me.

itg 12y ago

Used Ubuntu for a while, now mostly Arch Linux

paulrpotts 12y ago

I used Ubuntu on several generations of home-built boxes, the most recent a Xeon on an Intel motherboard, but Ubuntu has reduced compatibility with my motherboard's video. I just moved to Fedora Server 21 and left the GUI off altogether. We'll see how that goes... I have a lot of apt-get commands in muscle memory.

jrgifford 12y ago
Yeah, the times I've tried to use CentOS or Fedora have always been full of "apt-get" in my bash history. :(

ljk 12y ago

#! - http://crunchbang.org/ http://crunchbang.org/

stevekemp 12y ago
Do you have plans for an alternative now that development has ceased? (http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=416493#p416493 http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=416493#p41649...)
- ljk 12y ago
  I didn't even know about that, but I'll keep using it till my computer falls apart!

zwiteof 12y ago

I'm using Korora with Cinnamon, but I've been playing with i3 window manager lately to replace the desktop.

jrgifford 12y ago

Until I figure out my nvidia drivers for my laptop, Ubuntu 14.04 on a VPS.

deleted 12y ago

[deleted]

WillNotDownvote 12y ago

Ubuntu 14.04 on my laptop. I stayed on 10.04 as long as I could, but eventually the lack of support for Chrome and so on convinced me to update. Plus I have 14.04 running on all the servers where I have a choice.

johnny22 12y ago

Fedora 21 almost everywhere.

panchjanya 12y ago

Fedora 21, SL 6.1

alltakendamned 12y ago

Xubuntu 14.04.1 LTS, running on a Dell XPS 13

feybay 12y ago

Arch. I just started using it a few weeks ago for development purposes and it blows the socks off of every other OS I have ever used in almost every way (besides the initial install).

Joona 12y ago

Latest Debian netinstall if I do use Linux.

haidrali 12y ago

Ubuntu 12.

sejje 12y ago

Ubuntu, but w/ fluxbox.

brickcap 12y ago

I am using xubuntu(14.10). I like it because it is small,fast and supports ubuntu packages.

andyn 12y ago

Not an answer, but people who are using Mint; is there an official upgrade path between releases yet? How do you upgrade?

sfilipov 12y ago
All Mint point releases (17, 17.1, 17.2) are going to use Ubuntu 14.04 as a base. That means upgrading Mint 17 is low risk task until Mint 18 is released in 2016 (based on Ubuntu 16.04). Also expect Mint Debian Edition based on Debian 8.0 (Jessie) to be released later this year. Currently the Debian edition of Mint is rolling release but the developers have agreed that starting with Jessie, they will use only stable releases to base their version on.

brudgers 12y ago

Ubuntu Studio 14.04 because: + the Ubuntu ecosystem is well supported, in particularAskUbuntu on StackExchange. + The Studio flavor comes with software that's cool even what I don't use, and the little I have used would have been hard to identify and select in my state of ignorance...it's pretty much the case that having audio and video tools is the only reason I've used them. + I personally don't like the way stock Ubuntu works (in little ways) and don't want to invest in configuration at this point in my life.

iends 12y ago

Ubuntu 14.04

carise 12y ago

Debian Wheezy at home (I learned Linux on Debian, so I guess it's kind of habit when I pick a distro); CentOS 6.6 at work. After hearing a few things about Arch, though, I will give that a try. :)

DanBC 12y ago

I am using Fedora20. I have unusual reasons - my 2009 Macbook Pro os broken such that booting OSX or the MacOS install disc will cause hard reboot very quickly. The efi boot-install of Fedora also crashes the machine; the bios boot uses a different graphics card and doesn't crash the machine. (The Plymouth boot logo is garbled and boot takes an age but it works). (I only think it's a broken graphics adaptor. I'd happily try any fault-finding that people suggest. ) I have strongly negative opinions of Fedora and I will never ever install it on any other system. I'm preparing to move over to Arch.

paramk 12y ago

Ubuntu 14.04

daw___ 12y ago

ArchLinux[0] with no desktop environment and openbox[1] as the window manager with a few custom keyboard shortcuts to launch every day use applications (xterm, sublime text, internet browser, bashrun2[2] (an application launcher)). Pros: - it uses ~80MB on idle out of 3GB of RAM with my setup - the wiki[3] covers everything you need to know to install, maintain and troubleshoot your box - community-driven packages repository[4] where you can find nearly everything and it's always up-to-date - great package manager[5] Cons: - installation process is not straightforward and there is no wizard for initial configuration. It personally took me a couple of attempts before managing to install AL on a machine with a UEFI motherboard - systemd [0] ArchLinux https://www.archlinux.org/ https://www.archlinux.org/ [1] Openbox http://openbox.org/wiki/Main_Page http://openbox.org/wiki/Main_Page [2] bashrun2 https://code.google.com/p/bashrun2/ https://code.google.com/p/bashrun2/ [3] Wiki https://wiki.archlinux.org/ https://wiki.archlinux.org/ [4] Arch User Repository https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository [5] Pacman https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/pacman https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/pacman

dllthomas 12y ago

Ubuntu, with a pretty customized setup.

auxym 12y ago

lubuntu right now because my current pc is an old laptop (c2d, 2gb), works well enough. In the past I've used manjaro with xfce and OpenSUSE with KDE. I've found manjaro quite a good compromise between a bare arch install that requires hours and hours of configuration, and a more 'full-featured' distro, which in my experience with OpenSUSE, felt a bit bloated. The good about these three is you have good access to community-driven packages, PPAs in the ubuntu ecosystem, the AUR is absolutely great (manjaro is arch-based), and for suse you can find most things through the Open Build System