3 ms·

Shykes doesn't "shuts it all down". And to be honest, I think he's got a pretty good point. If anything he encourages for the Docker format to be more documente

by steeve 12y ago

Shykes doesn't "shuts it all down". And to be honest, I think he's got a pretty good point. If anything he encourages for the Docker format to be more documented: > But here's a suggestion for you. If you were to complain that Docker's image format and runtime specification, as massively adopted as it is, is not appropriately documented, and it could be made easier to produce alternate implementations - then I would completely agree with you. In response, I would encourage the project maintainers to improve the specs documentation based on your suggestions. I would also encourage you to join the effort, and offer my help in the process.

Alupis 12y ago
> If anything he encourages for the Docker format to be more documented This was after the Docker project deleted the original spec [1] in September 2013 -- ACI wasn't publically annoucned until December 1st 2014, and then Docker rolled out their "standard" in a hurry on December 7th 2014. https://github.com/docker/docker/commit/eed00a4afd1e8e8e35f8ca640c94d9c9e9babaf7 https://github.com/docker/docker/commit/eed00a4afd1e8e8e35f8...
- ash 12y ago
  It was a container manifesto that got deleted in the commit you've mentioned. I don't see any spec there.
- girvo 12y ago
  That's not a spec. I've got no side in this, but what you're saying has happened and what actually seems to have happened based on reading your links doesn't match up, in my opinion.