4 ms·
I don't know where you got the impression from that Neo4j can't handle graphs of this size. We have users and customers running much larger graphs in production
by jexp 12y ago
I don't know where you got the impression from that Neo4j can't handle graphs of this size. We have users and customers running much larger graphs in production. So that _definitive fact_ is not true :)
- amp 12y agoI'm willing to believe that Neo4j could handle it (admittedly this research is 18 months old), but everything I see about the Neo4J licensing model indicates we could not link to it without also opensourcing our code, which is a no go for us.
- amp 12y agoOn a another note, I do recall a bit about where I had the capacity impressions from: http://neo4j.com/docs/stable/capabilities-capacity.html http://neo4j.com/docs/stable/capabilities-capacity.html That ~5B edges is roughly where we're currently at, however that is growing and the limit of 34B is under 10x of where we're currently at.