2 ms·
"You are certainly aware that the vast majority of code is under strict restrictions and will be leveraged for competitive/controlling purposes rather than bein
by DannyBee 12y ago
"You are certainly aware that the vast majority of code is under strict restrictions and will be leveraged for competitive/controlling purposes rather than being shared. Employees wishing to freely contribute code in these domains will have their requests denied.
"
??????
None of this is true.
I mean, literally none of this.
I don't even know where to begin.
- throwaway90999 12y agoThis isn't a complicated statement. Why are you struggling with it? Google does not open source the VAST majority of their code -- it remains tightly restricted. Surely agree this is an accurate statement?
- DannyBee 12y agoBecause it's an incredibly vague statement that is open to many interpretations? As written, actually, i don't agree with it. Google has open sourced > 100 million lines of source code, depending on how you count. I can't tell you what percent this is, but it is quite significant It is the vast majority of a number of products, and not the vast majority of a number of other products. In fact, for some subsidiaries, all of the code is open source. For some, it isn't. So your statement depends on a lot - who are you counting, what is "their code" (Code we've written, code we've modified, or code we use), etc If you make a detailed enough statement, i'd probably agree. But as written, there are plenty of cases where google open sources the vast majority of it's code.
- throwaway90999 12y agoIf you insist on continuing to be disingenuous we can simply end the conversation.