3 ms·
Seems like it will protect data-at-rest really well. Unfortunately there's still the issue of the file/Box Key existing[0] in plaintext on Box's servers. You're
by ecdavis 12y ago
Seems like it will protect data-at-rest really well. Unfortunately there's still the issue of the file/Box Key existing[0] in plaintext on Box's servers. You're trusting them to keep those servers secure against intrustion, and not to retain copies of the plaintext file/Box Key.
If you use this feature and someone seizes all your existing data from Box then they'll still need to use your Customer Keys and your HSMs to decrypt it. Fantastic. If, however, they compromise the servers and start stealing the Box Keys as they are generated then they'll have be able to decrypt the data encrypted with those Box Keys. Not so fantastic. It's a trade-off which may be worth it in some cases, but it's a trade-off nonetheless.
I wish reporters who write about this stuff would challenge the security model more than just asking Box PR if the service is secure.
[0] In memory, during encryption/decryption. https://blog.box.com/2015/02/breaking-the-last-barrier-to-cloud-adoption-with-box-enterprise-key-management/ https://blog.box.com/2015/02/breaking-the-last-barrier-to-cl...