4 ms·

I see the misunderstanding. When I say "contribute code freely" I mean "without restriction." You are certainly aware that the vast majority of code is under s

I see the misunderstanding. When I say "contribute code freely" I mean "without restriction." You are certainly aware that the vast majority of code is under strict restrictions and will be leveraged for competitive/controlling purposes rather than being shared. Employees wishing to freely contribute code in these domains will have their requests denied. We've both been employed by large SV companies; we both know how this works. The majority of software will be used in an attempt to control the market.

DannyBee 12y ago
"You are certainly aware that the vast majority of code is under strict restrictions and will be leveraged for competitive/controlling purposes rather than being shared. Employees wishing to freely contribute code in these domains will have their requests denied. " ?????? None of this is true. I mean, literally none of this. I don't even know where to begin.
- throwaway90999 12y ago
  This isn't a complicated statement. Why are you struggling with it? Google does not open source the VAST majority of their code -- it remains tightly restricted. Surely agree this is an accurate statement?
  - DannyBee 12y ago
    Because it's an incredibly vague statement that is open to many interpretations? As written, actually, i don't agree with it. Google has open sourced > 100 million lines of source code, depending on how you count. I can't tell you what percent this is, but it is quite significant It is the vast majority of a number of products, and not the vast majority of a number of other products. In fact, for some subsidiaries, all of the code is open source. For some, it isn't. So your statement depends on a lot - who are you counting, what is "their code" (Code we've written, code we've modified, or code we use), etc If you make a detailed enough statement, i'd probably agree. But as written, there are plenty of cases where google open sources the vast majority of it's code.
    - throwaway90999 12y ago
      If you insist on continuing to be disingenuous we can simply end the conversation.

DannyBee 12y ago

"You are certainly aware that the vast majority of code is under strict restrictions and will be leveraged for competitive/controlling purposes rather than being shared. Employees wishing to freely contribute code in these domains will have their requests denied. " ?????? None of this is true. I mean, literally none of this. I don't even know where to begin.

throwaway90999 12y ago
This isn't a complicated statement. Why are you struggling with it? Google does not open source the VAST majority of their code -- it remains tightly restricted. Surely agree this is an accurate statement?
- DannyBee 12y ago
  Because it's an incredibly vague statement that is open to many interpretations? As written, actually, i don't agree with it. Google has open sourced > 100 million lines of source code, depending on how you count. I can't tell you what percent this is, but it is quite significant It is the vast majority of a number of products, and not the vast majority of a number of other products. In fact, for some subsidiaries, all of the code is open source. For some, it isn't. So your statement depends on a lot - who are you counting, what is "their code" (Code we've written, code we've modified, or code we use), etc If you make a detailed enough statement, i'd probably agree. But as written, there are plenty of cases where google open sources the vast majority of it's code.
  - throwaway90999 12y ago
    If you insist on continuing to be disingenuous we can simply end the conversation.