as crazy as RMS may sound in his exchanges usually don't forget that some people didn't read past the first messages. read another message RMS responded here ht

as crazy as RMS may sound in his exchanges usually don't forget that some people didn't read past the first messages. read another message RMS responded here https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00594.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00... that's in response to the offer llvm made to give hand the copyright over to the FSF and integrate llvm to gcc. I had long been wondering why there was a llvm-gcc on apple machines a couple revisions back. basically he claims he didn't see the original llvm offer: >> "If people are seriously in favor of LLVM being a long-term part of GCC, >> I personally believe that the LLVM community would agree to assign the >> copyright of LLVM itself to the FSF and we can work through these >> details." > I am stunned to see that we had this offer. > Now, based on hindsight, I wish we had accepted it. >If I had seen it back then, I would not have had the benefit of > hindsight, but it would clearly have been a real possibility. Nothing > would have ruled it out. > I wish I had known about the offer.