4 ms·
OrientDB is more similar to Neo4j, http://www.orientechnologies.com/orientdb-vs-neo4j/ http://www.orientechnologies.com/orientdb-vs-neo4j/ and some folks think
by moondowner 12y ago
OrientDB is more similar to Neo4j, http://www.orientechnologies.com/orientdb-vs-neo4j/ http://www.orientechnologies.com/orientdb-vs-neo4j/ and some folks think of it as a decent alternative to it https://medium.com/@KevinHoffman/first-exposure-to-orientdb-9e6f3aeabd63 https://medium.com/@KevinHoffman/first-exposure-to-orientdb-...
I didn't have any performance issues with OrientDB, but it's worth noting that I worked with relatively small datasets (e.g. graphs with ~1000 edges).
Titan, given that it runs on HBase or Cassandra, is on a whole different level compared to these two graph DBs. If you're working on a small app which needs an ebedded graph DB, you'll definitely not use Titan.
- okram 12y agoThere are some compelling reasons to use Titan at smaller scales: http://thinkaurelius.com/2013/11/24/boutique-graph-data-with-titan/ http://thinkaurelius.com/2013/11/24/boutique-graph-data-with... (good in-memory performance -- like Neo4j) http://thinkaurelius.com/2013/03/30/titan-server-from-a-single-server-to-a-highly-available-cluster/ http://thinkaurelius.com/2013/03/30/titan-server-from-a-sing... (if you do grow, its easy to add more machine)