> What are they supposed to do if they want to implement features which are not supported by Firefox? If the features they want to use are not available in sta

> What are they supposed to do if they want to implement features which are not supported by Firefox? If the features they want to use are not available in standards-compliant web-browsers they should not be released on a public facing production website. I thought that was blindingly obvious, but the Chrome-effect is evidently taking quite a hold.