3 ms·
I've checked out quickly both Reapp and Touchstone. At the moment Reapp seems more mature: has better tooling (e.g. the command line tool to generate projects),
by moondowner 12y ago
I've checked out quickly both Reapp and Touchstone. At the moment Reapp seems more mature: has better tooling (e.g. the command line tool to generate projects), uses Webpack, has quite big UI kit, etc...
- jimmytucson 12y agoWhen you say Reapp seems more mature, what do you mean? It seems like Touchstone has been around longer. (Touchstone's Github repo has 1,469 followers and first commit was October 14th, 2014 vs. 200 followers and December 19th, 2014 for Reapp.)
- nwienert 12y agoMaturity !== Github stars I like the guys who made TouchstoneJS but for comparison sake, touchstonejs.io shows a list of features. Here are the "unchecked" ones that Reapp currently has (7 out of 9 of them): Retain scroll position Dynamic headerbar View nesting Partial view transitions Gesture navigation Cross-platform themes Project generator Landscape mode (just about) Also, I'd say the Gesture navigation and theming support took up 90% of Reapp's development, they were by far the hardest parts. It's what birthed the React animation mixin we use, which is really cool and powers all our animations.