4 ms·
Yep. The thesis of this essay is that choice is unequivocally good for users, handset makers, everyone. Experience doesn't play that out. The experience of a cu
by throwawaymsft 12y ago
Yep. The thesis of this essay is that choice is unequivocally good for users, handset makers, everyone. Experience doesn't play that out. The experience of a curated, pruned garden vs. a wild west scammy bazaar isn't a good one for users.
Here's what happens when you search facebook on Windows Store:
http://imgur.com/QDHcpG0 http://imgur.com/QDHcpG0
Choice is great! You can "choose" to install a scam app or the official one. Incompetent OEMs can "choose" to override system behavior. After all, Dell, HP & friends were known for really improving the PC software experience.
- Brakenshire 12y ago> The experience of a curated, pruned garden vs. a wild west scammy bazaar isn't a good one for users. But that is a choice. For example, I would prefer to recommend to my parents a system with more granular control over permissions than stock Android, and a market which is more curated than Google Play. It's fairly absurd that they can send off all of their contacts to some random third party server because they installed a flashlight app. > Choice is great! You can "choose" to install a scam app or the official one. To avoid that, you want to choose not to have to make that choice, by going to a more curated platform. I think the key to creating that alternative is by making both Android and HTML5 apps genuinely cross platform. Blackberry, CyanogenMod and/or Sailfish should support the emerging W3C Web API standards and Cordova, and then create a clear target for Android developers to deploy Android apps that don't rely on Play Services. The real need isn't for a third OS, it's for a real cross-platform development ecosystem, then there will be genuine space for innovation.
- userbinator 12y agoThat screenshot is more a product of bad UI design (no indication of the publisher?) than anything else. You can "choose" to install a scam app or the official one Those are not the only two categories of apps. This quote also comes to mind: "Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes."
- throwawaymsft 12y agoEven if the publisher is listed, Microsoft reviewers should be vetting logo infringement. As a developer, sure, become root and install whatever you want. As grandma, just trying to install Facebook on her tablet, do not allow any mistakes. No junkware allowed.
- bko 12y agoI'm not sure when that screenshot was taken but its probably an exaggeration. Actual search results: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/search#q=facebook&s=Store http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/search#q=facebook... You do have a point about a free for all. There was this great blog post about a month ago about someone installing the top 10 free downloads from download.com and the mayhem that ensues. http://www.howtogeek.com/198622/heres-what-happens-when-you-install-the-top-10-download.com-apps/?PageSpeed=noscript http://www.howtogeek.com/198622/heres-what-happens-when-you-...
- throwawaymsft 12y agoThe screenshot was real, but from about a year ago. Maybe things have changed. Here's a blog post showing the cesspool that was search results less than a year ago: http://www.fixedbyvonnie.com/2014/08/microsoft-windows-store-seriously-sucks/ http://www.fixedbyvonnie.com/2014/08/microsoft-windows-store...
- asyncwords 12y agoYour screenshot is out of date. Here's what actually happens when you search Facebook on Windows Store: http://i.imgur.com/crP7LDd.png http://i.imgur.com/crP7LDd.png