3 ms·
> I'm happy to pay a subscription fee for a reliable service that lets me stream movies/shows. The issue is, none exist. For example, Netflix used to have an am
by hsod 12y ago
> I'm happy to pay a subscription fee for a reliable service that lets me stream movies/shows. The issue is, none exist. For example, Netflix used to have an amazing selection before (I imagine) various licensing issues effectively crippled them.
There's effectively two models:
* The Netflix model, where a large group of people effectively pool a small amount of money each month and buy a big batch of content. You end up paying for some things you don't care about, but you also probably get some stuff you do want for cheaper than you could get it by yourself.
* The iTunes model, where each person decides what content they want and pays for it directly. There are no bulk-discounts, so individual content pieces are more expensive.
Your argument seems to be that you want the unlimited content selection of the iTunes model, but you want to pay for it like the Netflix model.
Which is fine in the "I want a pony" sense, but seems to ignore economic reality.
- brandon272 12y agoSounds like his argument is that he's willing to pay a larger amount of money for a subscription based service that has excellent selection. How does that ignore economic reality?
- hsod 12y agoThat's already an option. He can essentially curate his own Netflix using a la carte services like iTunes or Amazon (non-Prime) Instant Video.