3 ms·

You can get the client to disable this via the My Sky page here: https://secure.sky.com/mysky-homepage/indexb https://secure.sky.com/mysky-homepage/indexb This

You can get the client to disable this via the My Sky page here: https://secure.sky.com/mysky-homepage/indexb https://secure.sky.com/mysky-homepage/indexb This is opt-in so they clicked a button somewhere when Sky asked them if they wanted adult content blocking. If anyone opts in to blocking; it's their funeral. It doesn't work. Sky's blocking even kills ThinkPad wiki.

nateguchi 12y ago
It seems that for the three people I have contacted, they have no recollection of being opted in to this adult blocking service
- monkeymagic 12y ago
  It asks you when you first connect the router. I suspect most people you have contacted are likely to have subconciously (or thoughtlessly) opted in. If you let me know the URL, I can test from here as I'm on the end of a Sky connection without the opt in blocking so that would confirm if it is that or not.
  - nateguchi 12y ago
    I can't let you know the URL, but http://medfirstalert.com/ http://medfirstalert.com/ is one of the other seemingly okay domains on this IP
    - monkeymagic 12y ago
      That's fair. The domain above resolves fine with and without the block: http://i.imgur.com/AIqtrxF.png http://i.imgur.com/AIqtrxF.png DNS cache was flushed between each hit.
  - tomtoise 12y ago
    A lot of people get technicians in to install the hardware, their default mode is to just next,next finish until the router is ready. Chances are it's the technicians themselves turning on the blocking. Not in a malicious or tinfoil hat way, just out of a desire to get the job done quickly
- Swifty 12y ago
  If you have an engineer set up the router, they may just click though the screen as part of the set up, or bypass the traditional set up to save time.
- desas 12y ago
  Probably because the government told ISPs that opt-in should be the default.
donny554 12y ago
Sky announced a couple of weeks ago that they intended to turn on their filtering by default. Maybe that's now happened. Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30896813 http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30896813
- AlyssaRowan 12y ago
  Yes, it has been, from my metrics at least - with predictable results! (Seems to be a phased/tranched rollout.) Don't get CloudFlare to budge you to another IP, you'll never know what may or may not be listed - most of the content on the default filter is not porn. This is Sky's problem, not CloudFlare's. It's deplorable, but entirely predictable (and they were repeatedly and loudly warned!) that innocent bystander sites have been blocked by the censorship on Sky's broadband network that people haven't even asked for. Have you perhaps considered legal action against Sky? You may also want to let them know, but they can't admin the filter themselves (last I heard), so can't whitelist you, and the equipment they have cannot proxy the site on their list without also affecting yours. (That you share an IPv4 address is not itself an issue with CloudFlare.) Don't mind me, I'm just getting snacks. This is going to get worse.
  - smcl 12y ago
    > Have you perhaps considered legal action against Sky? This is the real, correct solution but seems unlikely. The OP said his client is unable to shell out the extra $20/month for SSL on Heroku so it seems unlikely they'll want to pay for lawyers required for legal action :(
davidgerard 12y ago
This precisely fails to address the actual problem: his site is blocked for other users.

nateguchi 12y ago

It seems that for the three people I have contacted, they have no recollection of being opted in to this adult blocking service

monkeymagic 12y ago
It asks you when you first connect the router. I suspect most people you have contacted are likely to have subconciously (or thoughtlessly) opted in. If you let me know the URL, I can test from here as I'm on the end of a Sky connection without the opt in blocking so that would confirm if it is that or not.
- nateguchi 12y ago
  I can't let you know the URL, but http://medfirstalert.com/ http://medfirstalert.com/ is one of the other seemingly okay domains on this IP
  - monkeymagic 12y ago
    That's fair. The domain above resolves fine with and without the block: http://i.imgur.com/AIqtrxF.png http://i.imgur.com/AIqtrxF.png DNS cache was flushed between each hit.
- tomtoise 12y ago
  A lot of people get technicians in to install the hardware, their default mode is to just next,next finish until the router is ready. Chances are it's the technicians themselves turning on the blocking. Not in a malicious or tinfoil hat way, just out of a desire to get the job done quickly
Swifty 12y ago
If you have an engineer set up the router, they may just click though the screen as part of the set up, or bypass the traditional set up to save time.
desas 12y ago
Probably because the government told ISPs that opt-in should be the default.

donny554 12y ago

Sky announced a couple of weeks ago that they intended to turn on their filtering by default. Maybe that's now happened. Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30896813 http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30896813

AlyssaRowan 12y ago
Yes, it has been, from my metrics at least - with predictable results! (Seems to be a phased/tranched rollout.) Don't get CloudFlare to budge you to another IP, you'll never know what may or may not be listed - most of the content on the default filter is not porn. This is Sky's problem, not CloudFlare's. It's deplorable, but entirely predictable (and they were repeatedly and loudly warned!) that innocent bystander sites have been blocked by the censorship on Sky's broadband network that people haven't even asked for. Have you perhaps considered legal action against Sky? You may also want to let them know, but they can't admin the filter themselves (last I heard), so can't whitelist you, and the equipment they have cannot proxy the site on their list without also affecting yours. (That you share an IPv4 address is not itself an issue with CloudFlare.) Don't mind me, I'm just getting snacks. This is going to get worse.
- smcl 12y ago
  > Have you perhaps considered legal action against Sky? This is the real, correct solution but seems unlikely. The OP said his client is unable to shell out the extra $20/month for SSL on Heroku so it seems unlikely they'll want to pay for lawyers required for legal action :(

davidgerard 12y ago

This precisely fails to address the actual problem: his site is blocked for other users.