>At my previous job, site was rendering on server. It was old, >and we wanted to redesign it. I wanted to keep rendering on >the server. CTO and VP wanted to

>At my previous job, site was rendering on server. It was old, >and we wanted to redesign it. I wanted to keep rendering on >the server. CTO and VP wanted to build Angular site because >everyone is moving to Angular and its easy to find Angular >developers. Company's 30+% of new visitors comes through SEO. IMV most people don't understand the tradeoff's they're making when they adopt Angular - I'm seeing plenty of sites that have huge start up times due to them using Angular when they could equally achieve a better experience without it.