5 ms·
Original discussion to the original article posted by Jason Bock (which was merely copied by Dawood Sangameshwari without proper attribution [1]): https://news
by vog 12y ago
Original discussion to the original article posted by Jason Bock (which was merely copied by Dawood Sangameshwari without proper attribution [1]):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7819413 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7819413
[1] There is some attribution a the bottom of the page, but it isn't proper. It contains neither the original author's name, nor is it a clickable link. It's just a plain text URL. Better than nothing, but still the most shabby way of "attribution" I've ever seen.
- frostmatthew 12y agoAt the top of http://www.jasonbock.net/jb/News/Item/7c334037d1a9437d9fa6506e2f35eaac http://www.jasonbock.net/jb/News/Item/7c334037d1a9437d9fa650... Bock says I didn't write this, so I can't take credit for it so I'm not sure failing to include his name or clickable link really qualifies as "shabby" attribution.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- vog 12y agoAt least James Bock added a (clickable) link to the closest source he could find. Dawood Sangameshwari could have taken at least that one.