3 ms·
I believe the intention is basically "bind to a setter method, not a field." I'm guessing for much the same reasons the same is used in Java: You can change met
by jdmichal 12y ago
I believe the intention is basically "bind to a setter method, not a field." I'm guessing for much the same reasons the same is used in Java: You can change methods. You can add sanity checks, new behavior, etc.