4 ms·

I believe they're similar to uninterned symbols in Lisp, i.e. what you get in Common Lisp from make-symbol (or gensym). The main intended use-case seems to be t

by mjn 12y ago

I believe they're similar to uninterned symbols in Lisp, i.e. what you get in Common Lisp from make-symbol (or gensym). The main intended use-case seems to be to get "private" property names, by conjuring up a fresh name-like thing is not equal to any other name-like thing, and not findable/enumerable in the usual way either. You can then monkey-patch that into a class or do whatever other nefarious thing you were planning. I agree it's a somewhat confusing name, since interned symbols are the more familiar kind of symbol in other languages, especially in the modern era (older Lisps made more extensive use of uninterned symbols).

angersock 12y ago
So, that sort of makes sense if you were to use them as keys in the new Map and Set objects...but I again, I can't help but notice that I haven't felt their absence yet. Thanks for the reference about CL make-symbol. Is there a practical use for this we actually would spot in the wild, or do I need to go up on the mountain with a copy of The Art of the Metaobject Protocol?
- fpgeek 12y ago
  The standard Lisp use for generated symbols is to provide a way to reliably avoid name clashes during macro expansion. I'm not sure if that qualifies as a practical use in the out in the wild or just a practical way to fix pain (e.g. CPP nonsense) that you can see out in the wild.
- rnbwd 12y ago
  I had no idea what a Symbol even was until I stumbled upon alt - https://github.com/goatslacker/alt https://github.com/goatslacker/alt It's a small and simple code base, and much easier way to grok the concept than reading a book.
  - angersock 12y ago
    Good link. You can see the usage in the first few lines here: https://github.com/goatslacker/alt/blob/master/src/alt.js https://github.com/goatslacker/alt/blob/master/src/alt.js They seem to be being used mostly as immutable constants for readability--which kind of fits with normal use, right? I'm just trying to see if there's anything else here I'm missing.

by mjn 12y ago

angersock 12y ago

So, that sort of makes sense if you were to use them as keys in the new Map and Set objects...but I again, I can't help but notice that I haven't felt their absence yet. Thanks for the reference about CL make-symbol. Is there a practical use for this we actually would spot in the wild, or do I need to go up on the mountain with a copy of The Art of the Metaobject Protocol?

fpgeek 12y ago
The standard Lisp use for generated symbols is to provide a way to reliably avoid name clashes during macro expansion. I'm not sure if that qualifies as a practical use in the out in the wild or just a practical way to fix pain (e.g. CPP nonsense) that you can see out in the wild.
rnbwd 12y ago
I had no idea what a Symbol even was until I stumbled upon alt - https://github.com/goatslacker/alt https://github.com/goatslacker/alt It's a small and simple code base, and much easier way to grok the concept than reading a book.
- angersock 12y ago
  Good link. You can see the usage in the first few lines here: https://github.com/goatslacker/alt/blob/master/src/alt.js https://github.com/goatslacker/alt/blob/master/src/alt.js They seem to be being used mostly as immutable constants for readability--which kind of fits with normal use, right? I'm just trying to see if there's anything else here I'm missing.