2 ms·
Well.. I use BitBucket. It's not the best per-se but as I almost exclusively use Mercurial and host on Bit Bucket it makes sense. I am not sure I would recomm
by ErrantX 17y ago
Well..
I use BitBucket. It's not the best per-se but as I almost exclusively use Mercurial and host on Bit Bucket it makes sense.
I am not sure I would recommend it for serious projects; the hosting is stellar (and hg rocks as SCM :D) but if you have the time to integrate with Lighthouse or other such apps it's probably worth it.
- jespern 17y agoI'd love to get some suggestions on what you think would make it a better tracker!
- ErrantX 17y agoWicked! Well.... Some sort of "roadmap" feature. The ability to manually mark a revision as being relevant to the ticket (like the auto feature you have). When a revision (or revisions) are related to a ticket display a prominent, separate, link(s) to them in the ticket. Due date and importance for tickets. Highlight the importance in the list view (e.g. urgent = red etc.). When a revision is "tagged" in the mercurial repository create a link to a "changelog" that lists fixed issues for that tag name (if it exists: version or milestone - or even a separate tagging system). That's just a few off the top of my head. (sorry; I always seem to be dissing you guys :( not intentional)
- jespern 17y agoDuly noted, thanks. :)