4 ms·
No my point was that if a critical bug appears in the system and you, the original contractor, has dropped off the radar (or whatever) they stand a much higher
by ErrantX 17y ago
No my point was that if a critical bug appears in the system and you, the original contractor, has dropped off the radar (or whatever) they stand a much higher chance of finding someone to fix it.
This is what we do for Bank software; they find a critical flaw that needs fixing and it is our job to hunter-killer for it and work with their team to nail it and integrate the solution.
I agree with the point you were making; just I felt the example was more driven by a different need (one very specific to that piece of software)
(or look at it another way there is much more likely to be a C programmer with experience in ATC software, an important sub-skill in this case, than a Scala one :D)
- RiderOfGiraffes 17y agoI suspect we are in "Violent Agreement". I also believe the chances of finding, say, a good enough Scala programmer to fix this software that has a problem are actually higher than the chances of finding a good enough C++ programmer to fix this other software that has a problem. I have no evidence, the reasoning is outlined in my other comment. I suspect we agree on all major points, and that things should be better than they are.