>> "whose full name is not even mentioned. (Her first name is Gill, but is her last name Carson? Unclear from the article.)" I think the general assumption whe

>> "whose full name is not even mentioned. (Her first name is Gill, but is her last name Carson? Unclear from the article.)" I think the general assumption when two people are married is that they have the same surname. I know this isn't always this case anymore but it seems to me that it's so common that if her surname was different they should point it out but that it's unnecessary to do so if it's the same.