> For people who use GPG for e.g. securing transferred documents that might be called in court If you have legal compliance issues like that, surely you have e

> For people who use GPG for e.g. securing transferred documents that might be called in court If you have legal compliance issues like that, surely you have enough money to pay someone to maintain a tool (even a GPG derivative!) that promises never to break backwards-compatibility? It seems like people are angry that something that was maintained for free is no longer being maintained for free. Given that they have never lifted a finger to help out (either financially or by providing code), that seems a bit petty.