6 ms·
I didn't see aptitude mentioned in her comment at all?
by jacalata 12y ago
I didn't see aptitude mentioned in her comment at all?
- derefr 12y agoSorry, I was assuming everyone here had read http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/01/24/perceptions-of-required-ability-act-as-a-proxy-for-actual-required-ability-in-explaining-the-gender-gap/ http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/01/24/perceptions-of-required.... What the link says (and proves): after screening off sex-linked differences in aptitude for mathematics (by giving high school kids "mathematical IQ" tests, etc.), there's no difference left over in how often women vs. men go into math/CS. Both men and women go as often as they have potential in the field. The only thing left to explain is where the difference in aptitude comes from. Right now, it is assumed to be a result of developmental androgen cues that cause spacial-navigation-related parts of the brain to grow bigger in men vs. women. Transpeople, as a group that much more often gets a non-sex-linked androgen dose in the womb, let you take that apart further into the individual possible factors of "androgen exposure in the womb" vs "androgen exposure at puberty".