3 ms·

WHAT? I have a very hard time understanding what you're saying here (but it could be very interesting). Could you post screenshots of textbooks? Or proofs?

• hga 12y ago
  Errr, all I'm pointing out are a couple of related details of classical mechanics that require the calculus, basically Newton's 2nd Law of motion (ignoring jerk and beyond, which you might describe as acceleration of acceleration). It is very interesting stuff, but I'd suggest studying the most basic bits of the calculus and classical mechanics if you want to go further (this is typically the first thing you're taught about both). At this level it's not all that hard.
  • lomnakkus 12y ago
    We can all claim that "it's elementary" or "basic". Put up or shut up. :) EDIT: At least link to something to support your rather opaque post.
    • hga 12y ago
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_mechanics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_mechanics http://www.amazon.com/Sears-Zemanskys-University-Physics-10th/dp/0201603225/ http://www.amazon.com/Sears-Zemanskys-University-Physics-10t... (Inexpensive older edition that's a good choice for self-study; see also the associated Study Guides and Student Solutions Manuals). Seriously, learn the very basics ("learn how the universe works" as I like to put it), for which I think there's no substitute, and what I'm saying will be clear. Or maybe find a "physics for poets" text that goes into these details, but that's an appeal to authority.