4 ms·
"If you want to put society at risk because you don't believe in science, that's not okay." WHAT?! Let me fix that for you so that it actually follows the sce
by anotherherring 12y ago
"If you want to put society at risk because you don't believe in science, that's not okay."
WHAT?!
Let me fix that for you so that it actually follows the scenario:
"If you want to put society at risk because you don't want to [potentially] harm yourself (it happens with vaccines), that's not okay."
And that is crap. Society (as government) has the right to force every individual to play Russian roulette?
- lkbm 12y agoIn Russian roulette, the chance of injury if you play is 1/6 and 0/6 if you don't. With vaccination the risk of injury is several orders of magnitude lower if you get it v. if you don't. And the risk from not getting it effects not just yourself. So, yeah, were the odds in Russian Roulette were such that playing it dramartically increased your health and safety and the health and safety of those around you, yes, the government should require it. But since those aren't the odds of Russian Roulette, it seems like a pretty dishonest analogy to use.