3 ms·
There's a related idea called the "transactional interpretation" of quantum mechanics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation http://en.wikip
by chriswarbo 12y ago
There's a related idea called the "transactional interpretation" of quantum mechanics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation
The idea is that every event (eg. a particle collision) sends waves forwards and backwards in time, eg. if * is an event and </> are waves moving backwards/forwards in time:
<- past future ->
<<<<<<<<<*>>>>>>>>>
The waves from multiple events can overlap and interfere, eg.
<<<<<<<<<<<<*>>>>>
<<<*>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The interference depends on the phase of the waves, but let's simplify and say that similar arrows are destructive (represented as a space) and opposite arrows are constructive (represented as a dash). In which case, the interference pattern of the example above would be:
*--------*
It looks like there is something which is created at the first event, travels through time to the second event, and is then destroyed. That "thing" is what we'd call a particle. This idea is called "transactional" because it treats the existence of a particle as not just depending on the event which creates it, but also on the event which eventually destroys it, and the interference of these "waves through time" is like a 'negotiation' between the two events.
- drostie 12y agoIt'd be interesting to know how they deal with the phase requirements--normally you have boundary conditions which set up these sorts of standing waves but it sounds like these "events" would not have that and thus would have to conspire their phases so that you wouldn't get something more like: ---* *--- Probably it's something like, "each event must exist on at least two different fields; if you look at the other (~) field too then this event looks like ---*~~~~~~~~*--- so that, for example, this electron clearly collided with a high-energy photon to become a muon for a time and then relaxed back to being an electron, emitting the photon back."
- loceng 12y agoAppreciate your explanation - thanks.