3 ms·
What is the intention of licensing the core server under AGPL? Does the REST API represent enough of a boundary behind the Pushpin server to separate the web a
by j_s 12y ago
What is the intention of licensing the core server under AGPL?
Does the REST API represent enough of a boundary behind the Pushpin server to separate the web application from the AGPL's requirement to give the source code to public users?
Edit: Are there any widely-used proxies this tightly coupled with applications that are released under a similar license? (Translation: is this normal?)
- jkarneges 12y agoYes, the intent is that the Pushpin<->backend interface is enough of a boundary that you don't need to provide the source code of your backend applications. The AGPL is used to protect Pushpin itself. Open sourcing it all was a big step for us. :)