3 ms·
Because this article is misleading. Apparantly, Koch has been subsidized by the german government thus felt no need to be used the FSFE. Secondly, gpg isn't r
by drzaiusapelord 12y ago
Because this article is misleading. Apparantly, Koch has been subsidized by the german government thus felt no need to be used the FSFE. Secondly, gpg isn't really used for enterprise email, SMIME is or commercial php.
There's a history of Koch that is pretty ugly. He tried to start a consulting company with said government money and seems to have a "pay me to fix bugs" attitude. This breathless "omg must donate now" sentiment dominant here is highly questionable.
gpg should be under and funded by FSFE not via begdonations and german government funding.
- reiichiroh 12y agoI'm curious to know if there's any proof for this?
- skj 12y agoI have that "pay me to fix bugs" attitude, too. After all, my chosen profession is software developer and one of the things my employer pays me to do is fix bugs.
- harkyns_castle 12y agoYeah I'd be keen to learn more of the nefarious stuff, if it exists, in which case the donation gets pulled back.
- jordigh 12y ago> seems to have a "pay me to fix bugs" attitude There's nothing wrong with that attitude. There's no reason why he should be doing work without pay. If people send him bug fixes and he refuses to merge them, that's something else. But he doesn't have to work for nothing. I assume that whatever money he may be receiving from the German government may be used for other kinds of developments, not bugs that don't affect him.