4 ms·
That would be node-gecko (if it existed), wouldn't it? But yes, it's a bit misleading, by node-firefox I was expecting the full blown browser written in javascr
by Mahn 12y ago
That would be node-gecko (if it existed), wouldn't it? But yes, it's a bit misleading, by node-firefox I was expecting the full blown browser written in javascript myself.
- treeform 12y agoOr some thing like node-js but using SpiderMonkey instead of V8. Name really does not fit and blows up expectations. node-firefox-simulator would be more apt.
- lastontheboat 12y agohttps://github.com/zpao/spidernode https://github.com/zpao/spidernode
- giancarlostoro 12y agoNo longer maintained, sadly.
- coldtea 12y ago>That would be node-gecko (if it existed), wouldn't it? Only if it followed exactly the same naming logic down to a t. But it didn't have to, node-firefox would also be a perfectly apt name for something like node-webkit based on gecko too -- and not suitable at all for what it actually is now.