> It is not at all apparent to me that ISPs have a need to be involved in subjective decisions like [determining when traffic is or should be illegal and blocka

> It is not at all apparent to me that ISPs have a need to be involved in subjective decisions like [determining when traffic is or should be illegal and blockable] What makes you think they are or would be under this proposal? The announcement said, "These enforceable, bright-line rules will ban paid prioritization, and the blocking and throttling of lawful content and services." It says nothing about unlawful content. If blocking lawful content is illegal, but not-blocking unlawful content is not illegal, obviously ISPs will err on the side of not blocking grey-area content. It will only be obviously unlawful content that is blocked, which is really no different than today's situation.